Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(vdp): fix create/update connection input parameters #230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

joremysh
Copy link
Collaborator

@joremysh joremysh commented Oct 14, 2024

Because

  • protobuf definition types for connection should be encapsulated for better DX

This commit

  • encapsulate protobuf definition types for connection

Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 14, 2024

@joremysh joremysh merged commit f3d0bec into main Oct 14, 2024
9 checks passed
@joremysh joremysh deleted the jeremy/ins-6564-fix-create-connection-parameters branch October 14, 2024 07:59
joremysh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.15.0](v0.14.0...v0.15.0)
(2024-10-22)


### Features

* **ray:** support shorter downscale config for test models
([#234](#234))
([954f94b](954f94b))


### Bug Fixes

* **vdp:** allow empty input for recipe parameter
([#229](#229))
([033ca6c](033ca6c))
* **vdp:** fix create pipeline input parameters
([#225](#225))
([3fd0538](3fd0538))
* **vdp:** fix create/update connection input parameters
([#230](#230))
([f3d0bec](f3d0bec))
* **vdp:** fix update pipeline mask
([#236](#236))
([2107a40](2107a40))
* **vdp:** fix update pipeline parameter
([#233](#233))
([b19a59c](b19a59c))
* **vdp:** rename create pipeline input parameters
([#228](#228))
([2220438](2220438))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants